Comments on: With $188 worth in ad revenues, how much journalism can you afford to put into the average online article? http://jon-lund.com/main/with-188-worth-in-ad-revenues-how-much-journalism-can-you-afford-to-put-into-the-average-online-article/ Advicing, speaking and analyzing Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:47:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tweets that mention With $188 worth in ad revenues, how much journalism can you afford to put into the average online article? « Jon Lund -- Topsy.com http://jon-lund.com/main/with-188-worth-in-ad-revenues-how-much-journalism-can-you-afford-to-put-into-the-average-online-article/comment-page-1/#comment-4100 Tweets that mention With $188 worth in ad revenues, how much journalism can you afford to put into the average online article? « Jon Lund -- Topsy.com Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:00:50 +0000 http://jon-lund.com/main/?p=660#comment-4100 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WikiLeaks, Marqueue. Marqueue said: RT @wikileaks Good analysis of new media ecomomics using Denmark as a subject (note top earner was WL derived) http://bit.ly/6Go3r0 [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WikiLeaks, Marqueue. Marqueue said: RT @wikileaks Good analysis of new media ecomomics using Denmark as a subject (note top earner was WL derived) http://bit.ly/6Go3r0 [...]

]]> By: Ole Sauffaus http://jon-lund.com/main/with-188-worth-in-ad-revenues-how-much-journalism-can-you-afford-to-put-into-the-average-online-article/comment-page-1/#comment-4097 Ole Sauffaus Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:59:36 +0000 http://jon-lund.com/main/?p=660#comment-4097 Still you seem blinded by the format... in this case “deeds of journalism”. You are forgetting to think out-of-the-box, in order to find alternatives for reaching the true goal, as the deeds of journalism now, is on the brink of extinction. Well... I have only read your intro, and can't realy know what I'm talking about :) Perhaps you actually do present many ideas for changes we should work on, in order for the world to function still, even without the deeds of journalism of yesteryear. Still you seem blinded by the format… in this case “deeds of journalism”.

You are forgetting to think out-of-the-box, in order to find alternatives for reaching the true goal, as the deeds of journalism now, is on the brink of extinction.

Well… I have only read your intro, and can’t realy know what I’m talking about :)

Perhaps you actually do present many ideas for changes we should work on, in order for the world to function still, even without the deeds of journalism of yesteryear.

]]> By: Jon Lund http://jon-lund.com/main/with-188-worth-in-ad-revenues-how-much-journalism-can-you-afford-to-put-into-the-average-online-article/comment-page-1/#comment-4096 Jon Lund Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:34:18 +0000 http://jon-lund.com/main/?p=660#comment-4096 Ole, What I want to preserve is the deeds of journalism. Not the media per se. regards, Jon Ole,

What I want to preserve is the deeds of journalism. Not the media per se.

regards,

Jon

]]> By: Ole Sauffaus http://jon-lund.com/main/with-188-worth-in-ad-revenues-how-much-journalism-can-you-afford-to-put-into-the-average-online-article/comment-page-1/#comment-4095 Ole Sauffaus Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:22:55 +0000 http://jon-lund.com/main/?p=660#comment-4095 You are looking for answers in the wrong place imho. It HAS BEEN the medias traditional role to “keep the elite from screwing over Joe Sixpack”. But the world changes, and the media business model can't keep up, which leads to collaps. What we need to look for, is NOT a way to preserve the media, but a new way to “keep the elite from screwing over Joe Sixpack”. When you focuses on the format, and not the goal, you WILL end up with faulty conclusions. What we need is not to prolong media life... what we need is a new society-structure, that won't be prone to “screwing over Joe Sixpack”. Look for what you need, not for what you want. You are looking for answers in the wrong place imho.

It HAS BEEN the medias traditional role to “keep the elite from screwing over Joe Sixpack”. But the world changes, and the media business model can’t keep up, which leads to collaps.

What we need to look for, is NOT a way to preserve the media, but a new way to “keep the elite from screwing over Joe Sixpack”. When you focuses on the format, and not the goal, you WILL end up with faulty conclusions.

What we need is not to prolong media life… what we need is a new society-structure, that won’t be prone to “screwing over Joe Sixpack”.

Look for what you need, not for what you want.

]]>