{"id":1578,"date":"2011-01-13T18:02:42","date_gmt":"2011-01-13T16:02:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/?p=1578"},"modified":"2013-02-25T21:04:03","modified_gmt":"2013-02-25T20:04:03","slug":"a-free-web-edition-of-your-magazine-doesnt-cannibalize-paid-ipad-sales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/a-free-web-edition-of-your-magazine-doesnt-cannibalize-paid-ipad-sales\/","title":{"rendered":"A free web edition of your magazine doesn&#8217;t cannibalize paid iPad-sales"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Newspapers and Magazines going iPad all faces the same social problem. We&#8217;d love people to talk about us and the stuff we do. But one a rare minority owns an iPad. And only a fraction of those runs the app. There simply isn&#8217;t enough volume in the readership to make conversations meaningfull. And as a result, iPad-magazines often lacks the dynamics and liveliness which the web has taught us to love.<\/p>\n<p>However &#8211; there is a workaround: publish your content on the web as well. For free.<\/p>\n<p>Argh! We DON&#8217;T want free. We want money. That&#8217;s why we want to go iPad in the first place. Now you tell us we&#8217;ll have to give it all away anyway in order to make sense? That&#8217;s a no-go!<\/p>\n<p>Well, that&#8217;s right &#8211; except for one thing: the form factor. People might still want to pay to read the iPad version &#8211; because it&#8217;s more convenient, because it&#8217;s better looking, because it gives you a carefully designed package of content as contrasted to the atomized world of the web.<\/p>\n<p>The first numbers seems to back up this claim. First stats seem to imply that iPad-magazines sells equally well no matter whether the content is also available for free on the web or not.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2010\/12\/29\/iPad-magazine-sales-decline\/\">According to Mashable<\/a> (who quote <em>Women\u2019s Wear Daily who quote official numbers from the Audit Bureau of Circulation) <\/em>the iPad version of\u00a0Vanity Fair,\u00a0Glamour,\u00a0GQ, \u00a0Men\u2019s Health and\u00a0Wired all sold in very different numbers. But all of them ended up after a few month selling approximately half the volume of the iPad-version compared to news-stand-sales of the printed version.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"Vanity Fair oplagschart\" src=\"http:\/\/chart.apis.google.com\/chart?chxl=0:|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov&amp;chxp=0,1,2,3,4,5,6&amp;chxr=0,1,6&amp;chxt=x&amp;chs=640x250&amp;cht=lxy&amp;chco=3072F3,FF0000&amp;chds=0,218000,0,20000,0,100,0,500000&amp;chd=t:-1|9000,7485,10507,10056,10850,8700|-1|260000,350000,490000,450000,330000,400000&amp;chdl=iPad+sales|Newsstand+sales&amp;chdlp=b&amp;chls=2,4,1|1&amp;chma=5,5,5,25&amp;chtt=Vanity+Fair+Single+Issue+Sales\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"250\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"GQ oplagschart\" src=\"http:\/\/chart.apis.google.com\/chart?chxl=0:|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov&amp;chxp=0,1,2,3,4&amp;chxr=0,1,4&amp;chxt=x&amp;chs=640x250&amp;cht=lxy&amp;chco=3072F3,FF0000&amp;chds=0,218000,0,10000,0,100,0,700000&amp;chd=t:-1|1206,4301,3427,2775|-1|550000,616000,530000,440000&amp;chdl=iPad+sales|Newsstand+sales&amp;chdlp=b&amp;chls=2,4,1|1&amp;chma=5,5,5,25&amp;chtt=Glamour+Single+Issue+Sales\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"250\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"Mens health oplagschart\" src=\"http:\/\/chart.apis.google.com\/chart?chxl=0:|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov&amp;chxp=0,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7&amp;chxr=0,0,7|1,0,500000&amp;chxt=x,y&amp;chs=640x250&amp;cht=lxy&amp;chco=3072F3,FF0000&amp;chds=0,218000,0,5000,0,100,0,500000&amp;chd=t:-1|2181,3602,2912,0,0,2000,2000|-1|438821,435999,446944,267500,267500,380000,385600&amp;chdl=iPad+sales|Newsstand+sales&amp;chdlp=b&amp;chls=2,4,1|1&amp;chma=5,5,5,25&amp;chm=r,FF0000,0,0,0&amp;chtt=Men's+Health+Single+Issue+Sales\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"250\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"GQ oplagschart\" src=\"http:\/\/chart.apis.google.com\/chart?chxl=0:|Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov&amp;chxp=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11&amp;chxr=0,1,11&amp;chxt=x&amp;chs=640x250&amp;cht=lxy&amp;chco=3072F3,FF0000&amp;chds=0,218000,0,30000,0,100,0,250000&amp;chd=t:-1|15325,7454,6030,10222,13051,17000,12220,13092,11184,12065,11000|-1|216000,199000,178000,177000,181015,175042,159000,218000,180000,187000,180000&amp;chdl=iOS+sales|Newsstand+sales&amp;chdlp=b&amp;chls=2,4,1|1&amp;chma=5,5,5,25&amp;chm=x,FF0000,0,3:3:3,5&amp;chtt=GQ+Single+Issue+Sales\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"250\" \/><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wired-oplagschart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1570 alignnone\" title=\"Wired oplagschart\" src=\"http:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wired-oplagschart-590x230.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"590\" height=\"230\" srcset=\"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wired-oplagschart-590x230.png 590w, https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wired-oplagschart-196x76.png 196w, https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wired-oplagschart.png 640w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 590px) 100vw, 590px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Vanity Fair and Wired had all content for free on the web &#8211; Mens Health and Glamour didn&#8217;t and GQ did partly. And they all showed the same sales results &#8211; more or less.<\/p>\n<p>Comparing iPad only to newsstand sales isn&#8217;t quite conclusive.\u00a0One should compare to total sales (including subscription) as well. Nevertheless it does seem price of web doesn&#8217;t really matter. A free web edition of your magazine doesn&#8217;t cannibalize the paid iPad-sales.<\/p>\n<p>If this holds true, go ahead and make your iPad-mag social. You can only profit from the free web edition required to do so.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Newspapers and Magazines going iPad all faces the same social problem. We&#8217;d love people to talk about us and the stuff we do. But one a rare minority owns an iPad. And only a fraction of those runs the app. There simply isn&#8217;t enough volume in the readership to make conversations meaningfull. And as a&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/a-free-web-edition-of-your-magazine-doesnt-cannibalize-paid-ipad-sales\/\" class=\"\" rel=\"bookmark\">L\u00e6s mere &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A free web edition of your magazine doesn&#8217;t cannibalize paid iPad-sales<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1578"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1578"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1582,"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1578\/revisions\/1582"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jon-lund.com\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}