First Danish fullblown online grocery store misses mark

Posted: July 1st, 2010 | Author: Jon Lund | 2 Comments »

Half a year after opening up it’s online operations, the website of Danish retailer Superbest comes in ten of ten in reach compared to the websites of other Danish retailers, even though Superbest is the only of the competitors to offer full-blown online grocery shopping. This is among the findings in my latest report. I say: lower the prices (convenience alone won’t do it), start building trust through social networking activities and make the services known through advertising.

Largest grocery store retail-websites in Denmark. Adult users (15 years+). Source: FDIM/gemiusAudience, April 2010.

Ten of ten is really not impressing
Superbest.dk reached 90.000 adult danes during april 2010. That’s not a high number. In total 795.500 Danes visited at least one of the top ten Danish grocery store websites. Superbest.dk in this way only had a grab at 11,6 percent of all visitors. A number which is spot on the Superbest market share in the “real” world measured in terms of total sales (11,5 percent in 2009). Only none of the competing websites offered more than at most sales of non-food items from their websites. By that token superbest.dk should have performed better.

Also the visitors to the superbest-website was found only to visit the site some 1,4 times in average during April 2010. A score which once more puts superbest-dk near the bottom of top-ten list. If users really had embraced the online grocery shopping concept, they’d have visited the site several times a week.

Convenience won’t do
The reason why superbest.dk isn’t doing any better is, I think, threefold. First, the declared value proposition of superbest.dk is to make things easier – not cheaper – for the consumer: do the grocery shopping in the night or during the day-time, whenever it suits you best, at work or at home. Manage your own time – and be willing to pay for it: the regular offers from the physical outlets don’t apply online.

Looking at the data, however, there’s nothing to suggest the actual users of superbest.dk feels this way. Those most in need of time – families with two or more kids – are underrepresented at superbest.dk with 13.000 visitors in total in April while those with plenty of time – the singles – are overrepresented, featuring some 25.500 adults living by themselves.

Convenience, it seems, won’t do the trick alone. However much Danes want to save time, they also want to save money! While they might be willing to pay to have the goods delivered to their doorsteps, they don’t like the goods themselves to be overpriced.

(I suspect the fear of cannibalization to be a part of the the reason for adopting the convenience strategy. Fear however has never been a good advisor. And lack of cannibalization not a measure of success in it’s own right.)

Confidence is needed
Several surveys have shown confidence – broadly speaking – to be one of the main obstacles to e-commerce. People want to be sure they get what they’ve ordered, delivered at the right time to the right price with no hidden fees. And online, consumers are always have this nagging fear, that something in the online store, it’s payment or delivery processes may be broken in some way. Or, worse, that someone in the process is deliberately trying to hustle you.

This is particularly true about Superbest, who fights a distrust legacy. In September 2009 – just prior to the launching of the online store – it was revealed how seven Superbest-stores had re-packaged, re-labelled and sold old meat, causing a public scandal and forcing Superbest to fire those responsible for the handling of meat. As a consequence consumer trust in supermarkets dropped, and Superbest suffered a severe loss of credibility.

Online, however, nothing is done to address concerns like these. The online grocery store looks fine and professional – and actually works just as you’d expect. But the dialogue is missing. The ability of the site to let consumers raise concerns and ask questions – and to let Superbest answer those question, sorting out misunderstandings or -perceptions whenever they occur – are non-existing. Customer testimonials are non-existing. Likewise, there is no integration to external consumer-sites, who could endorse – or criticize! – the workings of Superbest.dk. No official Facebook group. No Twitter-profile.

Customers are consequently left without any way to find out whether Superbest.dk is or is not worthy of being entrusted with their shopping list.

Tell us about it!
One final factor contributing to explaining the Superbest.dk-lack of success is – advertising. Superbest simply hasn’t been running any ad-campaigns telling customers to get online. And it goes without saying, that as long Superbest themselves tries to keep their online store a secret, nothing much happens.

As mentioned, Superbest may have had other corporate communication priorities for the past half year than to ensure maximum launch of superbest.dk. Namely trying to minimize the consequences of the “old meat scandal”. This also could explain the lack of social networking: when threatened on it’s life, many corporations seek as much control over the situation as possible. Even though a proper use of social media might actually have helped Superbest regain consumer-trust at large.

When (and if) things settle down, Superbest might have a second shot at the online retailing market. When the meat scandals are forgotten they might find a way to go forth and meet the market and the consumers face to face. Embracing criticism, comments and dialogue, and shouting out loud that Denmark has now a first-class online shoppping store.

Download full report (in Danish)

Send, download and print. Price: 345 ddk/€45,50 (ex. VAT)

“E-handel og dagligvarer på nettet i Danmark. Superbest.dk-casen” 18 pages, 4 illustrations.

To order the report, send an email to jon@jon-lund.com including your contact information with subject: “Buy Superbest-report”, and you’ll receive both the report as pdf-file and an invoice.


Facebook crosses the generation gap, spreads transparency

Posted: August 25th, 2009 | Author: Jon Lund | No Comments »

Just published my new “Digital view: Life on the Danish internet august 17-23 2009″, and this is fascinating I think: Half of the Danish population are using Facebook. More specific: 2,47 mio Danes visited facebook at least once during the month of June (June, 2009 – research carried out by Gemius).

What’s more: Facebook apparently catches all age-groups – even the youngest, who have left their hitherto preferred native and front-running Danish social networking site, arto.com. Even the eldest: Almost half of Danes over the age of 60 who are online uses facebook! (numbers are all there in the report)

This has lots of implications. The perhaps most important is that Danes in this way are building a shared knowledge about the (increasingly digital) world in which we live. Paving way for a more homogeneous Danish society, I’d say! Not being fragmented into diverse sub-cultures, but knitting the diverse subcultures together in an online meta-community.

Don’t get me wrong: off course we’re not all sitting there, talking and updating and networking each other. But: While you may not be online-friends with your teenage-boys, and while you may not know the exact substance of their social activities (what photos they upload, what they write in their status-mentions), you do know what it’s all about, you’ve been there, tagged that, commented this and this gives you a chance to adopt real-world conversations on how they’re doing. It enables you to reach out, it offers you to build bridges between yours and their worlds.

And what’s more: chances are one of their connections is also a connection of yours. Or a connection of a connection of yours. And that you in this way would be informed should they ever show signs of distress, of a character deemed socially important for you. (This has been a worry of a lot of parents: what if my kids are being harassed by their peers – or even worse: are being approached by seemingly innocent characters who turns out to be pedophiles or the like).

These are all perspectives from an individual point of view. In the world of business, perspectives are almost stumbling over each other. Read a few of them in the analysis.


Official Danish adspend 2007: internet a pair with tv on 17 %

Posted: May 19th, 2008 | Author: Jon Lund | No Comments »

In 2007 TV and internet adspend cut out each their 17 percent slice of the total ad-pie. With a 39 % growth internet in this way reached 2,502 billion dkk bringing it a pair with TV, growing by only 2 percent, and totalling 2,516 billion dkk.

Print media is still the favourite of Danish advertisers. Daily newspapers alone accounted for 22 percent of total adspend (3,2 billion dkk), whereas regional and local weekly papers with total revenues of 2,7 billin dkk took out it’s 19 % adspend-pie-slice.

Danish adspend 2007

In a scandinavian perspective the Sweedish and Norwegian online adspend reach respectively 17 and 11 percent of their national adspend-pies.

These are some of the key conclusions from the Reklameforbrugsundersøgelsen 2007, the official Danish adspend statistics, which is going to hit the streets in a few days (apparently something went wrong in the printing process, forcing a minor delay) You’ll be able to find the figures at Dansk oplagskontrols website lateon.  Meanwhile click here for an excel spreadsheet with my own notes from teh reklameforbrugsundersøgelsen 2007 presentation.

This afternoon the results were presented at Copenhagen Business School. I attended:-)


Danish online adspend hits € 330 mio full year 2007

Posted: April 15th, 2008 | Author: Jon Lund | No Comments »

FDIM (the IAB Denmark) today publishes the 2007 full-year findings. Here’s the full report (in Danish with summary in English). Key findings are:

  • Overall year-on-year growth rate of 39 % 
  • Display advertising grew astonishing 67 % from € 59 mio in 2006 to € 99 mio in 2007
  • Search grew 50 % from € 48 mio to € 72 mio
  • Classifieds (directories, yellowpages and auctions) grew 20 % from € 118 mio to € 142 mio
  • Permission marketing grew 69 % from rather low € 8,6 mio to € 14,5 mio

FDIM writes:

“The survey encompasses: Display Advertising (including banners and sponsorships, rich media, textual and contextual advertising), Search (paid listings excepting site optimization or paid inclusion), Classifieds (eg. employment, automotive or auctionbased listings and yellow pages), Permission Marketing (email-based) and Miscelaneous. The FDIM Ad Ex study is based on advertising revenues as reported by IAB Denmark members to Deloitte. All figures are net figures not including agency commission. For non-participating companies conservative estimates have been applied.”

The results compares nicely to the UK numbers recently published by IAB UK, which displayed an overall growth rate of 38 percent, and growth of display ahead of the search-growth.